Proposed Code of Conduct

I’m not personally opposed to that principle, but I think it’s a bit of a tangent from the main point I was trying to make. Even if you make that the policy, there can still exist users and mods who think that calling a trans man a “she” is not hostile to the person, and users and mods who think that it is. I think prospective users deserve to know which kind of mod they’re signing up to be governed by.

(But also,

I really hope you didn’t mean that to include the slur case!)


To be clear, the value (that I see missing in a CoC that doesn’t make explicit reference to specific types of harassment) is the signal to potential users that this community considers certain controversial things to be harassment at all.

The legalese you quote above sounds like it’s describing prohibited reasons for discriminating against a person, not describing prohibited behaviors considered to be harassment, but it does satisfy the value of signaling that discriminating based on those qualities is considered wrong. Perhaps it also has the effect of encouraging rules lawyers, which is something that I too would hope to avoid.

I would propose something more along the lines of:

I would hope that something written along those lines would not be a breeding ground for rules lawyers, while also sending a clear signal to prospective members about specific types of harassment that may concern them.

1 Like